VisDoc-OOD
We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.
- ModelScoreYour cost / mo
- 1Marengo 3.5 · TwelveLabs67.58 score
“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.
How each maker reported it
- Marengo 3.5 technical launch post; launch post
TwelveLabs' own evaluation. Default output dimensions: 512 for Marengo 3.5 and 3.0, 3,072 for Gemini Embedding 2 and Amazon Nova Multimodal Embeddings. Retrieval uses nDCG@10, composed retrieval R@5, classification and QA Hit@1; the production suites are TwelveLabs benchmark sets. ECE: lower is better. For MMEB-v2, TwelveLabs states only the improvement over Marengo 3.0 (text-to-video +6.29, video QA +15.26, image QA +15.81 points), not 3.0's own scores, so that column is blank.
Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.