Toolathlon-Verified
We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.
- ModelScoreYour cost / mo
- 1Muse Spark 1.1 · Metabest value75.6%
- 2DeepSeek-V4-Pro · DeepSeek74.1%
“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.
How each maker reported it
- Muse Spark 1.1 model page; report §5
Highest reasoning effort for every model (high for Gemini 3.1 Pro, max for Opus 4.8). "Muse Spark (1.0)" is the earlier model. Third-party scores are Meta's best-effort runs.
- DeepSeek-V4-Pro model card (0813)
Code-agent tasks use DeepSeek Harness minimal mode at max effort, temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95. DSBench rows are DeepSeek internal test sets. Competitor figures as published by DeepSeek.
Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.