aiaimodel.cards
← All benchmarks

Tacit Knowledge and Troubleshooting

We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.

Your workloadRAG over docs · 12K in · 600 out · 50K requests/mo · 30% cached
  1. 1GPT-6.1 Sol · OpenAIbest value
    88.5%
  2. 2GPT-6 Sol · OpenAI
    79.2%
  3. 3GPT-5.5 · OpenAI
    78.3%
  4. 4GPT-5.4 Mini · OpenAIbest value
    71.7%
  5. 5GPT-6 Luna · OpenAIbest value
    69.2%
  6. 6GPT-5.4 · OpenAI
    65.0%

“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.

How each maker reported it

  • GPT-6.1 Sol §5, §9

    The addendum reports safety and Preparedness evaluations, not general capability benchmarks. Cyber and bio scores are at maximum reasoning effort; bio scores are refusal-adjusted. HealthBench scores are length-adjusted.

  • GPT-6 Sol Appendix A, p.120–154

    The card reports safety and Preparedness evaluations, not general capability benchmarks. Cyber scores are at maximum reasoning effort; GPT-5.6 Sol cyber values are its maximum scores using more tokens. HealthBench scores are length-adjusted. SandboxBench is targets solved out of 22. Astra values only where the appendix states them.

  • GPT-5.5 §5, §9.1, p.12, p.24–39

    The card reports safety and Preparedness evaluations, not general capability benchmarks. Several values are read from the card's labelled charts. HealthBench scores are length-adjusted; the card's health comparison column is labelled "GPT-5.4". Biochemistry is reward@4, protein binding pass@4, DNA design pass@1, CTF pass@12, Tacit Knowledge cons@32; Internal Research Debugging is a median score.

  • GPT-5.4 Mini §6.3, Tables 18–20, p.36

    The appendix reports only Preparedness evaluations. Bio values are without counting refusals; counting refusals and safe completions as successes, GPT-5.4 mini scores 47.0%, 34.24%, 77.77% and 33.11%. Tacit Knowledge is cons@32, CTF pass@12, others pass@1.

  • GPT-6 Luna Appendix A, p.120–154; GPT-6.1 Sol addendum Table 9

    The card reports safety and Preparedness evaluations, not general capability benchmarks. Cyber and bio scores are at maximum reasoning effort; HealthBench scores are length-adjusted. MentalHealthBench comes from the GPT-6.1 Sol addendum.

  • GPT-5.4 §3.6, §5.1, §6.3, p.10, p.18–28, p.36

    The card reports safety and Preparedness evaluations, not general capability benchmarks. Most values are read from the card's labelled charts; GPT-5.4 mini values come from the card's appendix tables. GPT-5.2 Thinking's Cyber Range rate is a lower bound. The health comparison columns are labelled "GPT-5.4" and "GPT-5.2". CTF is pass@12, Tacit Knowledge cons@32.

Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.