aiaimodel.cards
← All benchmarks

SWE-Atlas-QnA

We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.

Your workloadRAG over docs · 12K in · 600 out · 50K requests/mo · 30% cached
  1. 1Grok 4.5 · xAIbest value
    84.0%
  2. 2Mistral Large 4 · Mistral AIbest value
    59.4%

“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.

How each maker reported it

  • Grok 4.5 §2–7, p.5–19

    Grok 4.5 at high effort; competitors at max (Fable 5 with fallback), GPT-5.5 at xhigh. Results come from mixed harnesses and evaluators; some competitor figures are taken from developers' own cards. CyberGym is run without production safeguards.

  • Mistral Large 4 launch post

    Preliminary, vendor-reported preview results. Many charts in the post give no numbers; only figures stated in text are listed. Blind human coding eval run by Surge AI on a 1–5 scale.

Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.