MM MTBench
We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.
- ModelScoreYour cost / mo
- 1Ministral 3 14B · Mistral AIbest value8.49 Score
- 2Ministral 3 8B · Mistral AIbest value8.08 Score
- 3Ministral 3 3B · Mistral AIbest value7.83 Score
“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.
How each maker reported it
- Ministral 3 14B model card, Benchmark Results
Mistral's tables give fractions (0.551); shown here as percentages. Qwen3 14B is in non-thinking mode for the Instruct rows and thinking mode for the Reasoning rows; it is not multimodal (no MM MTBench). Gemma3-12B appears only in the Instruct table. The model card also has a Base-model table, not shown.
- Ministral 3 8B model card, Benchmark Results
Mistral's tables give fractions (0.551); shown here as percentages. Qwen3-VL-8B is the Instruct model in the Instruct rows and the Thinking model in the Reasoning rows. The model card also has a Base-model table, not shown.
- Ministral 3 3B model card, Benchmark Results
Mistral's tables give fractions (0.551); shown here as percentages. Qwen3-VL-4B is the Instruct model in the Instruct rows and the Thinking model in the Reasoning rows; Qwen3-VL-2B and Gemma3-4B appear only in the Instruct table. The model card also has a Base-model table, not shown.
Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.