MathVista
We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.
- ModelScoreYour cost / mo
- 1Seed 2.0 Pro · ByteDancebest value89.8%
- 2Llama 4 Maverick · Metabest value73.7%
- 3Llama 4 Scout · Metabest value70.7%
“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.
How each maker reported it
- Seed 2.0 Pro Tables 3, 8, 11 (pp.9, 13, 16)
ByteDance's own runs. Competitor columns are as printed in the Seed2.0 card (frontier models available in early 2026). Codeforces is an Elo rating. HLE-text under Agentic is with search tools.
- Llama 4 Maverick Benchmarks: Instruction tuned models
Meta's own 0-shot results on bf16 weights. Llama 3.x models have no image support and a 128K context, so those cells are not reported.
- Llama 4 Scout Benchmarks: Instruction tuned models
Meta's own 0-shot results on bf16 weights. Llama 3.x models have no image support and a 128K context, so those cells are not reported.
Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.