← All benchmarks
MATH (CoT)
We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.
Your workloadRAG over docs · 12K in · 600 out · 50K requests/mo · 30% cached
- ModelScoreYour cost / mo
- 1Llama 3.3 70B · Metabest value77.0%
- 2Llama 3.1 8B · Metabest value51.9%
“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.
How each maker reported it
- Llama 3.3 70B Benchmarks: Instruction tuned models
Meta's own results with its internal evaluation library; shots and metrics per Meta's table.
- Llama 3.1 8B Benchmark scores: Instruction tuned models
Meta's own results with its internal evaluation library; shots and metrics per Meta's table.
Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.