LiveCodeBench v6

How each maker reported it

• Qwen3.8-Flash model card (Benchmark Results)

  Qwen's own tables. SWE tasks use Claude Code or mini-SWE-agent at temperature 1.0 and 256K context; HLE judged by GPT-4o. OSWorld 2.0 and two-setting rows are split. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is not in the vision table.

• Qwen3.8-27B model card (Text Performance, VL Performance)

  Qwen's own tables. SWE-bench Pro uses Claude Code on a corrected task set (Opus 4.6 is its published score). HLE judged by GPT-4o. Muse Glimmer-30B's CharXiv cell (78.8) does not say which setting, so it is left out. Qwen3.7-Plus figures here differ slightly from the Flash-Next card (e.g. SWE-bench Pro 57.6 vs 55.8).

• Qwen3.7-Plus Qwen3.8-Flash-Next model card (Benchmark Results)

  Qwen published Qwen3.7-Plus scores as a comparison column in its Qwen3.8 cards. The Qwen3.8-27B card reports slightly different Qwen3.7-Plus numbers for some rows (e.g. SWE-bench Pro 57.6, DeepSWE 14.2).

• Seed 2.0 Pro Tables 3, 8, 11 (pp.9, 13, 16)

  ByteDance's own runs. Competitor columns are as printed in the Seed2.0 card (frontier models available in early 2026). Codeforces is an Elo rating. HLE-text under Agentic is with search tools.

• Seed 2.0 Lite Tables 4, 8, 12 (pp.10, 13, 17)

  ByteDance's own runs from the Seed2.0 model card, which predates the 260428 snapshot served now. Codeforces is an Elo rating. Seed 2.0 Mini is shown for comparison (same table).

• Gemma 4 31B Benchmark results

  Instruction-tuned models, as published in Google's model card. OmniDocBench is edit distance (lower is better). Audio benchmarks are omitted because 31B has no audio input.