HumanEval
We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.
- ModelScoreYour cost / mo
- 1GPT-4.1 · OpenAIbest value94.5%
- 2GPT-4.1 Mini · OpenAIbest value93.8%
- 3GPT-4o Mini · OpenAIbest value87.2%
“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.
How each maker reported it
- GPT-4.1 openai/simple-evals README; Prompting Guide §1
OpenAI's simple-evals results (zero-shot chain-of-thought, system prompt "You are a helpful assistant."). MATH is MATH-500 for models released on or after o1; OpenAI considers MGSM and DROP saturated for newer models. The repo stopped adding results in July 2025. SWE-bench Verified is OpenAI's own agentic harness result from the prompting guide.
- GPT-4.1 Mini openai/simple-evals README
OpenAI's simple-evals results (zero-shot chain-of-thought, system prompt "You are a helpful assistant."). MATH is MATH-500 for models released on or after o1; OpenAI considers MGSM and DROP saturated for newer models. The repo stopped adding results in July 2025.
- GPT-4o Mini openai/simple-evals README; GPT-4o System Card Tables 8–10, p.24–25
OpenAI's simple-evals results (zero-shot chain-of-thought, system prompt "You are a helpful assistant."). MATH is MATH-500 for models released on or after o1; OpenAI considers MGSM and DROP saturated for newer models. The repo stopped adding results in July 2025. Language rows are 0-shot accuracy from the GPT-4o System Card (translated ARC-Easy, translated TruthfulQA, Uhura-Eval). GPT-4o values: simple-evals uses the gpt-4o-2024-05-13 snapshot; the system card does not name a snapshot.
Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.