← All benchmarks
FrontierSWE (dominance)
We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.
Your workloadRAG over docs · 12K in · 600 out · 50K requests/mo · 30% cached
- ModelScoreYour cost / mo
- 1Grok 4.5 · xAIbest value78.0%
“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.
How each maker reported it
- Grok 4.5 §2–7, p.5–19
Grok 4.5 at high effort; competitors at max (Fable 5 with fallback), GPT-5.5 at xhigh. Results come from mixed harnesses and evaluators; some competitor figures are taken from developers' own cards. CyberGym is run without production safeguards.
Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.