aiaimodel.cards
← All benchmarks

FACTS Grounding

We haven't written a description for this benchmark yet; see the card notes below for how each maker ran it.

Your workloadRAG over docs · 12K in · 600 out · 50K requests/mo · 30% cached
  1. 1Gemini 2.5 Pro · Googlebest value
    87.8%
  2. 2Gemini 2.5 Flash · Googlebest value
    85.3%
  3. 3Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite · Googlebest value
    84.1%
  4. 4Gemma 3 27B · Googlebest value
    74.9%

“Best value”: no other model here reports a higher score at a lower cost for your workload. Scores are self-reported by each maker with different settings, so treat close calls as ties.

How each maker reported it

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro p.5–6

    Results as of June 2025, as published in Google's model card. Single-attempt pass@1. Competitor figures are providers' own numbers as listed by Google; Claude 4 Opus is 32K thinking. Aider Polyglot uses diff-fenced for 2.5 Pro and diff for the others. MRCR v2 for Claude 4 Opus is with no thinking.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash p.5–6

    Results as of May 2025 for Gemini 2.5 Flash GA with thinking, as published in Google's model card. Competitor figures are as listed by Google; Claude 3.7 Sonnet uses 64K extended thinking where available, Grok 3 Beta extended thinking. MRCR v2 here is the earlier (non 8-needle) version. Aider Polyglot and SWE-bench rows are left out because their columns are ambiguous in the PDF text.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite p.5

    Results for the 06-17 release (the stable model) as of June 2025, as published in Google's model card. Results for the shut-down 09-2025 preview are left out.

  • Gemma 3 27B Benchmark results

    Instruction-tuned (IT) results from Google's Gemma 3 model card.

Only each model's own maker's number is shown; scores a maker reports for rival models are left out.